Owner Reviews |
| Submitted by: | Clive Gray | Review Date: November 2016 |
Comfort | | I find it pretty comfortable but doubt a pillion would! | | Ride Quality | | Ride is a bit harsh as standard. I have fitted an Ohlins shock off a Daytona R which is much plusher. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | No problem to date. |
| Engine Rating | | Fantastic motor. Plenty of mid range but also revs out and sounds fantastic. |
| Brake Rating | | Brakes are powerful with good feel and ABS. |
| Running Cost | | Longer service intervalsb |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Love this bike. Handles and goes great. Perfect pretty much everywhere except motorways and who wants to go there? Great bike highly recommended. Get one! |
| Cons Comments | Longer service intervalsb |
| Submitted by: | Sam Evans | Review Date: November 2016 |
Comfort | | | | Ride Quality | | |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | |
| Engine Rating | | Very powerful but can't take long wheelies |
| Brake Rating | | |
| Running Cost | | Stronger forks, make parts cheaper. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Very good bike to ride wheelie machine |
| Cons Comments | Stronger forks, make parts cheaper. |
| Submitted by: | Vin Dixon | Review Date: December 2016 |
Comfort | | Really comfy except when on motorways, but them it is a naked! | | Ride Quality | | Fantastic! |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | No issue so far |
| Engine Rating | | Whilst not the most powerful, it's more than enough for me |
| Brake Rating | | Plenty of grip, but ABS would be useful |
| Running Cost | | The dash controls are too complicated |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Perfect mix of weight, power and style. Just a great bike, More than I can use without making me feel like I'm not in control. |
| Cons Comments | The dash controls are too complicated |
| Submitted by: | Andy Spiller | Review Date: February 2017 |
Comfort | | I'm 6ft2 and this is a great fit for me - bar position is great and no wrist pain or leg cramp to speak of. | | Ride Quality | | Firm yet compliant and extremely reassuring - I did a 140 mile ride this week and no complaints, even at my age! |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Excellent - cannot fault it. I find myself cleaning it to retrain as much of the factory-fresh lustre as possible. |
| Engine Rating | | Sublime and I've only got to 8000rpm so far in the running-in period - looking forward to winding it up over the next 500 miles. |
| Brake Rating | | Really strong and progressive - I've had one ABS-triggered moment and only realised afterwards how completely drama -free that was. |
| Running Cost | | I would love a tiny bit more wind deflection at higher speeds as I am tall. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | This is my first bike and I absolutely adore it, and have from the moment I saw it really – despite its power potential its an easier bike to ride than the Honda CB600/650s I trained on, as it is incredibly light and balanced – slow speed traffic control is remarkable (and it is not the rider, I can assure you!), the suspension is rarely deflected mid-corner and I feel confident that as the weather warms and corresponding tarmac temperatures improve, the bike will reward as I gain cornering confidence. Absolutely fantastic. |
| Cons Comments | I would love a tiny bit more wind deflection at higher speeds as I am tall. |
| Submitted by: | Johnny | Review Date: March 2017 |
Comfort | | Naked bike not too good for sustained high-speed riding (e.g. motorways), high pillion position not suitable for long journeys. Good general riding position for commuting and short trips. | | Ride Quality | | Excellent handling and cornering, light and responsive. Smooth power from the triple cylinder engine. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | No problems after 2 years |
| Engine Rating | | Plenty of power and acceleration up to 100mph |
| Brake Rating | | Good stopping power and ABS works when needed |
| Running Cost | | Build quality of components – e.g. the throttle has a slight dead zone at the beginning which more expensive bikes don't seem to have. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Great bike for commuting and getting around town. Handling is easy and the bike is very responsive to where you want it to go. |
| Cons Comments | Build quality of components – e.g. the throttle has a slight dead zone at the beginning which more expensive bikes don't seem to have. |
| Submitted by: | Barabonc | Review Date: March 2017 |
Comfort | | | | Ride Quality | | |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | |
| Engine Rating | | |
| Brake Rating | | |
| Running Cost | | Range |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Great first bike, it will be a keeper for long term as it will nurture you first and grow with you when you get more confident. Just like a good friend! |
| Cons Comments | Range |
| Submitted by: | Martin Wilson | Review Date: March 2017 |
Comfort | | As a novice, I prefer the position to a sports bike. Do get tired on long journeys. Don't take pillion. | | Ride Quality | | Handles a dream and feels lightweight |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Not had it long enough to comment |
| Engine Rating | | Absolutely love it |
| Brake Rating | | The brakes aren't linked and there's no ABS |
| Running Cost | | Linked brakes and ABS |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | It is super awesome. I love it to bits. If only the weather were better to enjoy it more. |
| Cons Comments | Linked brakes and ABS |
| Submitted by: | Mike | Review Date: March 2017 |
Comfort | | Comfortable bike to ride even on a long ride from London up to the Lake District and back. However, I wouldn't attempt it with a pillion. | | Ride Quality | | The factory rear spring and damper settings are near perfect with no need to adjust when taking a pillion. The front dampers are excellent with plenty of feed back from the road. Being a light bike that is rather short it's awesome for chucking in to bends with plenty of confidence. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | The build quality is excellent and I've not had a single problem with it. |
| Engine Rating | | Being a triple cylinder with 105bhp it has plenty of torque and is revvy. It has the benefits of the torque of a twin and the smoothness of a four cylinder. |
| Brake Rating | | Nissin front and Brembo rear these brakes are cracking and do exactly what they were designed to do, stop you quick and safely. Especially with the ABS. |
| Running Cost | | The painted fuel filler cap surround is easily chipped when fuelling up if not too careful. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | The bike looks superb, with excellent handling and reasonable running costs and would certainly recommend one. Only downside is the recommended chain lubrication distance being every 200 miles. |
| Cons Comments | The painted fuel filler cap surround is easily chipped when fuelling up if not too careful. |
| Submitted by: | Migue | Review Date: March 2017 |
Comfort | | Very comfy bike but on long journey (250+ miles) you'll need a break for your rear or shoulders. | | Ride Quality | | Very precise cornering, smooth power delivering , very nimble and great for commuting too. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | I've done 21000 in two years and didn't have a single issue. Very sturdy and reliable machine. |
| Engine Rating | | 105 BHP. Powerful enough to have a lot of fun and to keep up with the bigger bikes too. |
| Brake Rating | | Nissin ABS 2 piston breaks. They work well but I miss the Brembos |
| Running Cost | | Big service at 12000/24000 is a bit pricey.Eye candy, make sure you don't spare money on security devices. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Great quality, Triumph dealers will sort any issues out without asking questions when the bike is under warranty.
Great bike to own as a first big bike and to learn progressively.
Great to commute and squeeze through traffic. Overall I'm very happy with my bike. I've become a keen rider since I own it and I'm itching every day I don't ride it.
|
| Cons Comments | Big service at 12000/24000 is a bit pricey.
Eye candy, make sure you don't spare money on security devices.
|
| Submitted by: | Vice | Review Date: March 2017 |
Comfort | | Standard seat is a bit uncomfortable, either the comfort seat or a custom seat can help achieve posterior bliss. Riding position is more upright and general ergonomics are acceptable. | | Ride Quality | | Lightweight, nimble and scalpel are a few words used to describe this bike. Handling is impeccable and twisty roads are an absolute joy to blast through. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Overall build quality is decent, few areas that could do with some improvements but no major issues so far. |
| Engine Rating | | Three is the magic number. |
| Brake Rating | | Have saved me on a few occassions, ABS has only kicked in once which was intentional to try figure out the bite point which is extremely late. Brakes are excellent overall. |
| Running Cost | | Looks, a bit ugly |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Great bike, quick, torquey, nimble and fantastic handling. Originally wanted a naked > 1L, but glad I got this instead in the end. It's more playful and less intimadating, allowing you push the limits of the bike with less risk of losing your license. Granted it's not the best looking (dem headlights), but like an ugly child you learn to love it. |
| Cons Comments | Looks, a bit ugly |
| Submitted by: | Callum | Review Date: May 2017 |
Comfort | | Firm ride but stable. Will take the gf out on the back this summer... | | Ride Quality | | Engine is smooth as glass, gearbox silk, telepathic handling |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Looks like it was put together well. Feels 'together' when you ride it |
| Engine Rating | | Perfect for street riding, enough power to get you in and out of trouble at the right rev range |
| Brake Rating | | Sharp brakes make two fingers braking very easy |
| Running Cost | | Stock mirrors are awful… no point in them being there. I've swapped for some three pistons after market bar end ones. Triumph accessories are expensive! |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Looks amazing, stock exhaust sounds great and looks great. Handles like a dream. The engine has a constant pull through the rev range peaking over 8k rpm which is lovely. Very easy to ride. My first fuel injected bike and it is amazing. Responsive, smooth, thrilling, fast. A beautiful piece of engineering. |
| Cons Comments | Stock mirrors are awful… no point in them being there. I've swapped for some three pistons after market bar end ones. Triumph accessories are expensive! |
| Submitted by: | Evo | Review Date: May 2017 |
Comfort | | | | Ride Quality | | |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | |
| Engine Rating | | |
| Brake Rating | | |
| Running Cost | | Nothing. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Absolutely the best balance of street and sports in one bike. Big bike killer. Light and nimble. I've had superbikes before and never thought I'd get a naked bike but one ride on a Street Triple R and you never need to look at another bike. More than enough power and just great chuckability. All round perfect! |
| Cons Comments | Nothing. |
| Submitted by: | Paul Groves | Review Date: May 2017 |
Comfort | | Very comfortable for short rides but I'm 6ft and find after 90 mins I find my hips and knees are getting a bit sore and need a stretch | | Ride Quality | | Really easy to ride and inspires confidence, feels surprisingly small and agile |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Overall build quality is excellent, had couple of clips replaced on radiator hose as tiny coolant leak and had tiny oil leak which I fixed by re-torquing the sump bolts, no more serious mechanical faults at all. |
| Engine Rating | | This is my first bike after my test and I've been delighted with my choice, plenty of power if required, but very easy to manage including around town. Great triple sound and great bark when pushed a little even with stock pipe. |
| Brake Rating | | No complaints at all from the brakes, good, predictable stopping power and reassurance with the ABS. |
| Running Cost | | There's not really anything to complain about at all, I guess for my next bike I might look for something more suited to longer rides, touring/adventure, but that's personal and no reflection on the Street Triple which does exactly what's expected really very well. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | This is a really easy bike to handle, I would wholeheartedly recommended it as a first big bike. It has the classic triple sound, with a great bark when pushed, it looks great and had the top Triumph build quality and their support and servicing had been excellent. A great looking, very fun bike, plenty fast enough but also very easy to ride. Definitely a great first big bike, no regrets! |
| Cons Comments | There's not really anything to complain about at all, I guess for my next bike I might look for something more suited to longer rides, touring/adventure, but that's personal and no reflection on the Street Triple which does exactly what's expected really very well. |
| Submitted by: | Paul Holloway | Review Date: May 2017 |
Comfort | | Nice and comfortable for the 1st hour, however the set in of numb bum kicks in soon after. | | Ride Quality | | A very flickable fun ride, with plenty of torque and top end if you need it. Its a very light and easy bike to move at low speeds. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Never had any issues with the bike, being a Triumph the build quality ans finish is spot on. |
| Engine Rating | | A great bike to ride and very responsive. |
| Brake Rating | | Very responsive brakes and ABS should it be needed. |
| Running Cost | | There is nothing I would change about the bike. Its spot on. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Visually stunning and gets a lot of heads turning. Arrow slip on makes it stand out a bit more. Seriously a lot of fun to ride, especially with the quick shifter. A great introduction for me to the world of motorcycling. Its a fantastic bike that will grow with me as i become more experienced. |
| Cons Comments | There is nothing I would change about the bike. Its spot on. |
| Submitted by: | Paul | Review Date: October 2017 |
Comfort | | Very nimble, considering it's a naked You can ride all day long. | | Ride Quality | | Point and go. Smooth and light as a feather. Goes round corners as if it were on rails. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | So far .build quality seems excellent |
| Engine Rating | | 765cc 121bhp |
| Brake Rating | | Brakes top quality and better than most larger bikes. ABS and traction control all help for a safe ride. |
| Running Cost | | Ride sensibly and it'll give you 60 mpg |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Performance, puts a smile on your face every time you go out on it |
| Cons Comments | Would like to call it Raquel and marry it. |
| Submitted by: | Sue S | Review Date: October 2017 |
Comfort | | Very comfortable to ride. Have done log distances but not carried a pillion so can’t comment there. | | Ride Quality | | Lovely smooth ride. Fairly lightweight and corners well. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Seldom any problems. Last autumn it would not start one day so replaced the battery and had no problems of any sort since. |
| Engine Rating | | Love this bike’s performance. Nippy, sported but great in town too. |
| Brake Rating | | Twin disc brakes with ABS. great grip. Never any problems. |
| Running Cost | | Does about 45mpg. Has cost nothing else other than servicing costs, replacement oil at service etc. Cheap to run as it is so reliable. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | It’s nippiness, acceleration, smoothness and forgiveness (I once took off from a junction in 4th gear, and it let me). This is a brilliant bike and I have no intention of changing it any time soon. |
| Cons Comments | As a naked bike it suffers buffeting on motorways. |
| Submitted by: | Adrian | Review Date: November 2017 |
Comfort | | I can't report on pillion comfort as I've ditched the rear pegs. As for Rider comfort anything more than 2-3 hours of solid riding starts to leave my backside a little numb. Maybe the optional gel seat would fix this, but as most of my rides last little more than an hour it's not usually a problem. | | Ride Quality | | Excellent balance of poise, control and comfort from the adjustable suspension on the R model. Soften for everyday use, tighten to gain race like feel for a blast in the twistys on the weekend. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | A couple of furry fasteners but on an all year round bike it's only to be expected. The powder coating is flaking off one of the engine cases after a couple of hard winters and less washing than is good for it. I had a little electrical connector burn out after salt water ingress resulting in the bike not starting after a fuel stop, this took 4hours for my garage to trace and fix as it necessitated the removal of fuel tank and airbox which was a pain in the wallet. Other than these it has out performed the Rider on every occasion. |
| Engine Rating | | It will lift the front wheel off the line if you are overzealous with the throttle, it spins up beautifully and howls with purpose. Only on a couple of occasions have I felt like it could do with a touch more torque but it never leaves you feeling disappointed with it. If in doubt just rev it harder before changing up. |
| Brake Rating | | Radial brakes up front haven't let me down and have plenty of progressive feel. No ABS hasn't ever been an issue, I've locked the front for a split second once but it was at -2 C and the tyres were cold, coming quickly off the brakes I was amazed at how well she regained composure. |
| Running Cost | | Servicing is done by a local trusted mechanic rather than main dealer and costs are reasonable. The triple returns about 47 mpg without being careful, I like to enjoy riding my bike without watching the clocks. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | The gearbox is slick, light but positive and responds well to clutchless up shifts without a quickshifter. A great all-rounder, even better than what all the journalists and testers say it is. Never a dull moment, never a disappointment. |
| Cons Comments | A fuel gauge would help as would a little more torque. Still looking for a more comfortable seat for those long weekend rides. More effective wind protection as an option could make this into an effective sports tourer / cafe racer too |
| Submitted by: | Adam Spencer | Review Date: November 2017 |
Comfort | | Much comfier than you think it would be, long journeys for a pillion would be harder to cope with but a few hours and no complaints. | | Ride Quality | | Handles perfectly, great tyres and brakes. Super light compared to rivals and smooth as anything, although preferres to be ridden pike you stole it, rather than poodling around, bike does well both ways but just feels happier with a bit of throttle. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Had an issue with the main dealer not adjusting the clutch properly and not torquing bolts on the engine correctly resulting is coolant leaking…. oh and the left switch cube being faulty and letting water in causing a short circuit. Although, all issues fixed quickly and still love it. |
| Engine Rating | | Engine is perfectly balanced, so full of character, give it 70% throttle and hear that bark. |
| Brake Rating | | Haven’t used them to full potential but brembos all round |
| Running Cost | | I don’t ride slow, and still get over 50mpg! |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | The sound and character. |
| Cons Comments | Mirrors. Bar end as standard would be good. |
| Submitted by: | David Shepherd | Review Date: November 2017 |
Comfort | | It's comfy enough for a good few hours before you need to get up for a bit. | | Ride Quality | | That triple engine is as Smith as you like and it glides around corners. It's not a heavy bike for its class even at slow speeds it's easy to handle |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | The finish on this bike as with all triumphs is second to none ther is loads of nice touches and finishes done on this machine. Iv never had a problem with it so far or no brake downs |
| Engine Rating | | The triple engine is a smooth and powerful engine with loads of useful power for on the road and on the track and bags of fun |
| Brake Rating | | The nissin brakes are exclent with their r version ther slightly better to. Not quite good as brembos but the next best thing |
| Running Cost | | So far I've had a tire replaced and 3 service all the same as most bikes really the down side on coast is the insurance it is more expensive compared to other bikes iv had. Fule wise aint grate but not the worst out ther it has a decent size tank so you can get more in though |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | I'm Not Going lie this is my first bike iv fallen in love with such a good bike well finished, sounds lovely handles like a dream and we'll British….. Well British company but probably made in Thai land. The problem I have with this bike is the insurance it is alot more than other bikes iv had having said that I think I'm Gona keep her for some time yet even though she dose cost me |
| Cons Comments | Brembo brakes and I would love the tft screen hell lets be honest id like the new 765 triple but she will more than do for quite a wile |
| Submitted by: | Scotty | Review Date: November 2017 |
Comfort | | Sporty but comfortable | | Ride Quality | | Confidence inspiring |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Good quality |
| Engine Rating | | Great sounding triple especially with the arrow exhaust |
| Brake Rating | | The R version comes with radial mounted calliper so plenty of stopping power. |
| Running Cost | | Not the most economical but a good balance of performance and mpg |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Lightweight, sporty fun |
| Cons Comments | Seat height quite for shorter riders. |
| Submitted by: | Ben | Review Date: November 2017 |
Comfort | | | | Ride Quality | | |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | |
| Engine Rating | | |
| Brake Rating | | |
| Running Cost | | |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Great handling, easy to use even as a first bike. |
| Cons Comments | Price. Very popular bike so used prices are high compared to other 600s. |
| Submitted by: | Callum | Review Date: November 2017 |
Comfort | | Comfortable position on long rides. Seat and suspension is a bit on the form side. Not bad with a pillion but not the greatest | | Ride Quality | | Planted, light, great handling, easy to ride |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Top notch |
| Engine Rating | | Linear, smooth as glass, responsive, all the power you will need and more for road riding |
| Brake Rating | | Firm, sharp brakes |
| Running Cost | | Economical on the motorway, mpg doesnt drop too much on b road blasts |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Looks, simplicity, ride-ability |
| Cons Comments | Clear headlight plastic going cloudy around the edges |
| Submitted by: | John Morley | Review Date: November 2017 |
Comfort | | The riding position is great and the suspension is fully adjustable. Wind protection isn't too bad for a naked, but loses a star for pillion comfort as the seat is rather small. | | Ride Quality | | Phenomenal. The handling is almost telepathic. The quickshifter and slipper clutch make gear changing effortless. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Never had an issue. Always starts first time. The bike feels really well built with no expense spared on all components. |
| Engine Rating | | The power is usable all the way through the range with plenty of torque on tap in the mid range. The bike really comes in to its own once you get passed 10k rpm. |
| Brake Rating | | The brakes are second to none. Brembo M50 monoblock calipers may seem a bit over the top for a road bike, but it's great having them there when you need them. Combined with ABS all around, they really inspire confidence. |
| Running Cost | | Insurance is very reasonable for a brand new bike. The bike averages 50mpg around town with since site riding. I'm sure you would easily get 60mpg with motorway miles. Fuel light usually comes on at 120 miles and there is easily another 40 miles in the tank. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | The whole bike inspires confidence and exudes quality. The 5 inch colour TFT screen is amazing. The Supercorsa SP tyres, Brembo M50 brakes and Ohlins rear shock really do make a fantastic package. |
| Cons Comments | I'd like to see a decent screen fitted to the bike, just to take some of that wind away from the upper torso. |
| Submitted by: | Alan Ford | Review Date: November 2017 |
Comfort | | Great for one up but would only give 2 – 3 stars for million comfort. | | Ride Quality | | Suspension is very firm for great handling and well balanced. |
| Build Quality & Reliability | | Very good quality. You pay a bit more than you would for Yamaha MT07 for example buy you can see where the money goes. |
| Engine Rating | | For a 675cc it's got a great spread of power and pretty quick |
| Brake Rating | | No problems stopping |
| Running Cost | | Decent mpg. Servicing costs at main dealers is a bit pricey though. |
| Overall | | |
| Pros Comments | Sporty but practical, great handling and well built. |
| Cons Comments | Longer front mudguard and radiator protector. Also a fly screen extension would be great for higher speeds. |
